Introducing the nudist journalism bingo card

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: journalism about nudism is, in general, terrible.
News sites know that nudity is compelling. It invites clicks, whether because people are generally interested in possibly getting a glimpse of skin, or because they’re outraged and want to vent their disgust.
But for some reason, news sites often add a stupid, childish slant to the content as well. Puns about body parts are common (how often do you see the word “abreast” or “cheeky” in other news articles?) as well as wordplay about nudity with terms like “exposure” and “bare”.
More problematic are the narratives that these articles play into. The general public tends to think nudity is inherently weird or silly; the extension of that idea is that nudists are weird, ridiculous people (and thus not deserving of journalistic objectivity or respect). And of course the association of nudity with sex means that nudists are secretly perverts and exhibitionists.
All nonsense, of course, but you’d be hard pressed to find an article about nudists that doesn’t take at least some of these tired, cliched jokes and mistruths and stick them in. Sometimes it’s just an editor adding a stupid title, …

Read further at Write Nude

0

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *