Child Nudisum

Submitted by Anonymous on Sun, 31/05/2009 - 18:28

I received a email for free prescription of their nudist magazine. When I opened it it was advertising miss jnr teen pageants. As far as I am aware in Australia any nude pics under 18 are illegal. I am new to nudism and still learning whats what, I was wanting to know whether I should report this site or not.
Thanks
Chris

Share this
No votes yet
‹ whats wrong with men who are all alone Ausnude Group ›

Not Illegal

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 24/05/2011 - 17:38.

NO ... Child nudity IS NOT Illegal in places where Nudity is permitted. Nudity Itself IS NOT Really Wrong anywhere actually: What IS Illegal is Indecent Exposure. However, for an act of Exposure (Nudity or Partial nudity or Exposing Private Parts) to be Indecent or Obscene, realistically, it has to be INTENTIONAL & OFFENSIVE to someone. Although nudity is Mostly Intentional, It Is not Illegal. As for Offending Someone, who is to know if a person is offended.
Nudity, even with Children IS NOT pornographic. Just do some Web searches on definitions of Pornography (for a photo to be Pornographic, it has to be concentrated on The Genitalia and the Adult/Child has to be in A Provocative Position). So NO ... The Photos in Those magazines are Completely Legal.

I think if a site has

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sun, 06/12/2009 - 16:04.

I think if a site has pictures or videos with naked children for sale, you should denounce it. They are making profits with it.

Child nudism and ? age of consent !

Submitted by Rob (not verified) on Fri, 04/09/2009 - 17:31.

The legalities of this have been answered more professionally already ! But with the Age of Consent at 16 years of Age - guess that gives some rational guidance.
Kids are part of the future in everything - and if Kids at nudist venues offend you perhaps best to re-think your values or even becoming involved in social nudism at all ?????

its not porn but its still wrong

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 18/12/2009 - 13:03.

its not that we find it affencive,its with all the sick fucks in our world today what they do with thease images why only show young girls i think u knoy.I would like to think there not being used for such things,but wake up loser you know the market ,thats why u try to justify what you post .if you need to explain yourself , that alone tells me theres something suss.

wot the site

Submitted by spidge on Sat, 18/12/2010 - 22:33.

wot is the site

'sick' people

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 12/01/2010 - 04:05.

yes they are out there. Yes there are too many (one of them is too many). But...they were there in the past too, people just were not allowed to talk about it. However, the fact is that there were just as many (if not more) nasty perverts in the Victorian era than there are now. Why? The more sexually messed up a society is, the more it produces perverts, who equate nudity with sex, and sex with evil - and you wind up with a lot of religious people who are willing to offend against kids, because they see all sex as equally bad and the kids are less likely to tell on them. YES there are some offenders who are in a cycle of abuse and abusers...but oddly enough they are not the norm.

Quite a number of pedophile priests (I know I read this in a study) were of the opinion that ANY sex drive was a bad thing, so they could not offend any worse than they had...just by having sexual desires of ANY kind. These people put molesting kids on the same footing as consensual sex with another adult, because of the teachings they were subjected to from birth.

The problem is, without the separation of nudity from the idea of sex, and with the mystique/fetish that surrounds the nude human body in 'big 3' religions (and the societies controlled by them)...there are a lot of people out there who CAN be messed up.

Before you Assume or State

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 24/05/2011 - 17:43.

Before you Assume or State something is WRONG and/or ILLEGAL: Do Some RESEARCH. Child Nudity Is NATURAL just Adult Nudity. It IS NOT Pornographic. try doing some GOOGLEING on PORNOGRAPHY !!!

Child Nudism

Submitted by uknaked (not verified) on Fri, 31/07/2009 - 07:23.

Child nudism as as much a part of life as adult nudism, normal nude pics are certainly not illegal.
What is illegal is any naked pic of an underage (depends on location) person, taken either posed in a blatantly sexual pose, or engaged in any form of sexual activity.
There is nothing sexual about natural nudity at any age!
Any consideration by an observer of normal nudity, that is of a sexual context, says more about the mind of the observer than the image being observed.

i agree in some respect,if i

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 18/12/2009 - 13:20.

i agree in some respect,if i see a naked body i dont think sex its the people who do ,and as we cant,read mindes we will never know. its the people with sick thoughts that make it grubby.So lets not have any of that on the net ,i will be happy when , aus bring in the tech to close such sites down,so then u know whats right and wrong. what the pen push belifes are are right fuck that

look around on the internet

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 19/10/2009 - 12:15.

look around on the internet and see at what age the laws come into effect.

The site youre probably

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 08/12/2009 - 09:37.

The site youre probably looking at is either
Bebaretoo purenudism or russian bare

the pageant is legal since the video is an actual pageant and therefore not pornography

also this is Russia the laws are different
even if it were made in America
unless the camera men are zooming in and out at there vaginas or the makers advertise it as sexy nudist preteens or something its legal

I swear people are overprotective nowadays

with all the pedifiles in

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 18/12/2009 - 13:06.

with all the pedifiles in cyber space think about what there looking at

Stop teaching shame to children

Submitted by Dario Western (not verified) on Sat, 01/05/2010 - 16:41.

Hi,

If we stopped teaching our children that the human body and sex between mature and consenting parties are bad things, then the world would be a more well adjusted place.

Paedophiles will look for sex anywhere there are children whether it be in videos or in real life. The clothing has nothing to do with anything.

Would you get upset if a paedophile bought videos by Bindi Irwin, or Harry Potter, or Dora The Explorer, The Wiggles or Bratz? All these vids are made with kids as the main interest.

If you see anybody behaving suspiciously with young children regardless of whether in a nude or dressed environment, alert the cops immediately.

Having a video of your

Submitted by Anonymous on Tue, 08/11/2011 - 09:03.

Having a video of your children doing gymnastics is fine. Going to a website that advertises that it has videos of Russian children doing gymnastics is just plain creepy (unless there is a legitimate point of interest eg it's an old video of an Olympic champion).
It applies to clothed people and therefore it applies to nude people too. Explain your good reason for having an interest in some.random.beauty pageant or just don't go there.

advertising

posts on econudes.org are owned by the original poster.
econudes.org is an alternative news network initiative.
drupal design and maintenance by Clemens Vermeulen.
Hosting by altnews. Drupal theme by Kiwi Themes.
Drupal SEO