Sun and Health magazine and New from Nudist Day
I clicked on the News from Nudist Day link and read:
"Sun and Health uses the same name as a nudist magazine that ceased publishing more than three years ago. According to Scriven, the owner of the defunct magazine de-registered the business name in 2005.
“We are not aware of any legal issues surrounding publication of our magazine and we are certainly not illegitimate”, she told Nudist Day. “It was a shame to see the old name die after more than 20 years”, she added. If one visits the site of the old Australian Sun and Health, you’ll encounter angry comments about the new magazine and its publishers. The author of the criticism, however, isn’t reachable for comment."
It's good to see the new magazine being given publicity. It is of course, a situation which needs to be reported tactfully. However, I am wondering why it is not possible to acknowledge that Sarah was half the editorial team which produced the 'Sun & Health' magazine, for so many years.
It is understandable that she would like to see the goodwill built up over the years, by the previous and initial editors and Sarah and Rod, being taken advantage of and not be allowed to dissipate.
I do not blame the publisher of Nudist Day for either not knowing or preferring not to mention that Sarah is keeping the name Sun and Health alive to build on the efforts that she and Rod have made in the past.
It is good to have that magazine being published in similar style to the previous version.